[DOWNLOAD] "Truth, Truths, "Truth," and "Truths" in the Law. (Panel I: Law & Truth: Pre-Modernism, Modernism, And Post-Modernism) (Federalist Society 2002 Symposium on Law and Truth)" by Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy # Book PDF Kindle ePub Free
eBook details
- Title: Truth, Truths, "Truth," and "Truths" in the Law. (Panel I: Law & Truth: Pre-Modernism, Modernism, And Post-Modernism) (Federalist Society 2002 Symposium on Law and Truth)
- Author : Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy
- Release Date : January 01, 2003
- Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
- Pages : * pages
- Size : 284 KB
Description
The best way to get a clear view of questions about truth--in the law or anywhere else--is to start, not with debates over "modernism" versus "post-modernism," and the whole dubious history of ideas they presuppose, but with a few simple distinctions. Truth is the property of being true, what it is to be true. Of the umpteen competing philosophical theories of truth, the most plausible are, in intent or in effect, generalizations of the Aristotelian Insight that "to say of what is that it is, or of what is not that it is not, is true." (1) These theories explain truth without reference to what you or I or anyone believes, without reference to culture, paradigm, or perspective. Some of them, the various versions of the correspondence theory, turn the emphatic adverb for which we reach when we say that p is true just in case actually, really, in fact, p, into serious metaphysics, construing truth as a relation, structural or conventional, of propositions or statements to facts or reality. (2) Others, such as Tarski's semantic theory, (3) Ramsey's "redundancy" theory, (4) and the contemporary deflationist, minimalist, disquotationalist, and prosententialist theories that are their descendants, (5) don't require such an elaborate ontological apparatus.